<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Database Geek Blog &#187; Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://database-geek.com/category/performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://database-geek.com</link>
	<description>Database Stuff, from a Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:19:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DBAs and Developers, Do you suffer from Performance Dysfunction (PD)?</title>
		<link>http://database-geek.com/2009/02/10/dbas-and-developers-do-you-suffer-from-performance-dysfunction-pd/</link>
		<comments>http://database-geek.com/2009/02/10/dbas-and-developers-do-you-suffer-from-performance-dysfunction-pd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lewi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://database-geek.com/2009/02/10/dbas-and-developers-do-you-suffer-from-performance-dysfunction-pd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://database-geek.com/2009/02/10/dbas-and-developers-do-you-suffer-from-performance-dysfunction-pd/">DBAs and Developers, Do you suffer from Performance Dysfunction (PD)?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://database-geek.com">Database Geek Blog</a></p>
<p>DBAs and Developers, Do you suffer from Performance Dysfunction (PD)? is a post from: Database Geek Blog</p>
<p>Posted by the Database-Geek.</p>
<p>DBAs and developers, do you suffer from PD? PD, performance dysfunction, is not a topic that many like to discuss. A few people do but they mostly hang out together at conferences and talk about the size of their tuples. For the rest of us, PD is an evil, evil thing.</p>
<p>There are as&#8230; <a href="http://database-geek.com/2009/02/10/dbas-and-developers-do-you-suffer-from-performance-dysfunction-pd/" class="read_more">Read the rest!</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://database-geek.com/2009/02/10/dbas-and-developers-do-you-suffer-from-performance-dysfunction-pd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comment by LewisC on Netezza Performance Server vs Oracle Database Machine (Podcast)</title>
		<link>http://database-geek.com/2008/12/23/comment-by-lewisc-on-netezza-performance-server-vs-oracle-database-machine-podcast/</link>
		<comments>http://database-geek.com/2008/12/23/comment-by-lewisc-on-netezza-performance-server-vs-oracle-database-machine-podcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Comments for An Expert's Guide to Oracle Technology</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://database-geek.com/2008/12/23/comment-by-lewisc-on-netezza-performance-server-vs-oracle-database-machine-podcast/">Comment by LewisC on Netezza Performance Server vs Oracle Database Machine (Podcast)</a> is a post from: <a href="http://database-geek.com">Database Geek Blog</a></p>
<p>Comment by LewisC on Netezza Performance Server vs Oracle Database Machine (Podcast) is a post from: Database Geek Blog</p>
<p>I think Phil would say that according to the Oracle page for the database machine:</p>
<p><i>The HP Oracle Database Machine is a complete system, including software, servers, and storage, designed to run large, multi-terabyte data warehouses 10x faster than conventional data warehouse systems.</i></p>
<p>Oracle is targeting data warehouses not &#8220;normal, everyday usage of Oracle Database.&#8221;</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://database-geek.com/2008/12/23/comment-by-lewisc-on-netezza-performance-server-vs-oracle-database-machine-podcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comment by &#8220;Simon Greener&#8221;  on Netezza Performance Server vs Oracle Database Machine (Podcast)</title>
		<link>http://database-geek.com/2008/12/23/comment-by-simon-greener-on-netezza-performance-server-vs-oracle-database-machine-podcast/</link>
		<comments>http://database-geek.com/2008/12/23/comment-by-simon-greener-on-netezza-performance-server-vs-oracle-database-machine-podcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Comments for An Expert's Guide to Oracle Technology</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://database-geek.com/2008/12/23/comment-by-simon-greener-on-netezza-performance-server-vs-oracle-database-machine-podcast/">Comment by &#8220;Simon Greener&#8221;  on Netezza Performance Server vs Oracle Database Machine (Podcast)</a> is a post from: <a href="http://database-geek.com">Database Geek Blog</a></p>
<p>Comment by &#8220;Simon Greener&#8221;  on Netezza Performance Server vs Oracle Database Machine (Podcast) is a post from: Database Geek Blog</p>
<p>Lewis,</p>
<p>Are we comparing apples with apples?</p>
<p>The Oracle database machine seems to me to be a generic machine trying to improve performance for normal, everyday usage of Oracle Database.</p>
<p>Oracle database includes some ROLAP functionality but is not, strictly speaking, a dedicated data warehouse database (cf HOLAP and MOLAP).</p>
<p>Because of this I would&#8230; <a href="http://database-geek.com/2008/12/23/comment-by-simon-greener-on-netezza-performance-server-vs-oracle-database-machine-podcast/" class="read_more">Read the rest!</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://database-geek.com/2008/12/23/comment-by-simon-greener-on-netezza-performance-server-vs-oracle-database-machine-podcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netezza Performance Server vs Oracle Database Machine (Podcast)</title>
		<link>http://database-geek.com/2008/12/16/netezza-performance-server-vs-oracle-database-machine-podcast/</link>
		<comments>http://database-geek.com/2008/12/16/netezza-performance-server-vs-oracle-database-machine-podcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>An Expert's Guide to Oracle Technology</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://database-geek.com/2008/12/16/netezza-performance-server-vs-oracle-database-machine-podcast/">Netezza Performance Server vs Oracle Database Machine (Podcast)</a> is a post from: <a href="http://database-geek.com">Database Geek Blog</a></p>
<p>Netezza Performance Server vs Oracle Database Machine (Podcast) is a post from: Database Geek Blog</p>
<p>LewisC&#8217;s An Expert&#8217;s Guide to Oracle Technology<br />
Are you involved in data warehousing at all? I have been for a long time. One of the things that has always interested me is the Data Warehouse Appliance. I once had the chance to see a demo of an earl&#8230;</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://database-geek.com/2008/12/16/netezza-performance-server-vs-oracle-database-machine-podcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Performance MySQL: Review</title>
		<link>http://database-geek.com/2008/08/04/high-performance-mysql-review-2/</link>
		<comments>http://database-geek.com/2008/08/04/high-performance-mysql-review-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LewisC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mysql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://database-geek.com/2008/08/04/high-performance-mysql-review-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://database-geek.com/2008/08/04/high-performance-mysql-review-2/">High Performance MySQL: Review</a> is a post from: <a href="http://database-geek.com">Database Geek Blog</a></p>
<p>High Performance MySQL: Review is a post from: Database Geek Blog</p>
<p>High Performance MySQL, Second Edition<br />
<br />
Optimization, Backups, Replication, and More</p>
<p class="book-details">By Baron Schwartz , Peter Zaitsev , Vadim Tkachenko , Jeremy Zawodny , Arjen Lentz , Derek J. Balling<br />
<br />
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://database-geek.com/2008/08/04/high-performance-mysql-review-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World&#8217;s Largest Database Runs on Postgres?</title>
		<link>http://database-geek.com/2008/05/28/worlds-largest-database-runs-on-postgres/</link>
		<comments>http://database-geek.com/2008/05/28/worlds-largest-database-runs-on-postgres/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LewisC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgres]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://database-geek.com/2008/05/28/worlds-largest-database-runs-on-postgres/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://database-geek.com/2008/05/28/worlds-largest-database-runs-on-postgres/">World&#8217;s Largest Database Runs on Postgres?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://database-geek.com">Database Geek Blog</a></p>
<p>World&#8217;s Largest Database Runs on Postgres? is a post from: Database Geek Blog</p>
<p>LewisC&#8217;s An Expert&#8217;s Guide To Oracle Technology</p>
<p>According to an article at Computerworld, Yahoo is running a 2 PB (not GB, not TB, PB &#8211; Petabyte) database that processes 24 billion events a day. Let&#8217;s put that in perspective. 24 billion events is 24,000 million events; 24,000,000,000 events. 1 petabyte is 1,000,000,000,000 bytes. Yahoo has two of those. Actually, I should be&#8230; <a href="http://database-geek.com/2008/05/28/worlds-largest-database-runs-on-postgres/" class="read_more">Read the rest!</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://database-geek.com/2008/05/28/worlds-largest-database-runs-on-postgres/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postgres 8.3 is out</title>
		<link>http://database-geek.com/2008/02/05/postgres-83-is-out/</link>
		<comments>http://database-geek.com/2008/02/05/postgres-83-is-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LewisC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgres]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://database-geek.com/2008/02/05/postgres-83-is-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://database-geek.com/2008/02/05/postgres-83-is-out/">Postgres 8.3 is out</a> is a post from: <a href="http://database-geek.com">Database Geek Blog</a></p>
<p>Postgres 8.3 is out is a post from: Database Geek Blog</p>
<p>Postgres 8.3 is out and it contains plenty of new and improved features.  Some of my favorites are: sql/xml support, text search, autovacuum improvements, performance improvements (significant) and some additional SQL changes.</p>
<p>You can read the press release.</p>
<p>You can also check out the feature list or review the simpler feature matrix which compares all of the versions since 7.4.</p>
<p>You may also want&#8230; <a href="http://database-geek.com/2008/02/05/postgres-83-is-out/" class="read_more">Read the rest!</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://database-geek.com/2008/02/05/postgres-83-is-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle® Database 11g Running on HP with Windows Sets New World Record</title>
		<link>http://database-geek.com/2007/09/15/oracle%c2%ae-database-11g-running-on-hp-with-windows-sets-new-world-record/</link>
		<comments>http://database-geek.com/2007/09/15/oracle%c2%ae-database-11g-running-on-hp-with-windows-sets-new-world-record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 03:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LewisC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://database-geek.com/2007/09/15/oracle%c2%ae-database-11g-running-on-hp-with-windows-sets-new-world-record/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://database-geek.com/2007/09/15/oracle%c2%ae-database-11g-running-on-hp-with-windows-sets-new-world-record/">Oracle® Database 11g Running on HP with Windows Sets New World Record</a> is a post from: <a href="http://database-geek.com">Database Geek Blog</a></p>
<p>Oracle® Database 11g Running on HP with Windows Sets New World Record is a post from: Database Geek Blog</p>
<p>Nifty!   Oracle® Database 11g Running on HP with Windows Sets New World Record.<br /></p>
<p>Oracle announced a new world record price/performance result with the TPC-C benchmark running Oracle® Database 11g on Windows. With this result, Oracle now holds the top two record benchmark positions in the coveted Top Ten TPC-C price/performance category. Optimized for small, medium&#8230; <a href="http://database-geek.com/2007/09/15/oracle%c2%ae-database-11g-running-on-hp-with-windows-sets-new-world-record/" class="read_more">Read the rest!</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://database-geek.com/2007/09/15/oracle%c2%ae-database-11g-running-on-hp-with-windows-sets-new-world-record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle Breaks Records With New TPC-C Benchmark</title>
		<link>http://database-geek.com/2007/08/13/oracle-breaks-records-with-new-tpc-c-benchmark/</link>
		<comments>http://database-geek.com/2007/08/13/oracle-breaks-records-with-new-tpc-c-benchmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LewisC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://database-geek.com/2007/08/13/oracle-breaks-records-with-new-tpc-c-benchmark/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://database-geek.com/2007/08/13/oracle-breaks-records-with-new-tpc-c-benchmark/">Oracle Breaks Records With New TPC-C Benchmark</a> is a post from: <a href="http://database-geek.com">Database Geek Blog</a></p>
<p>Oracle Breaks Records With New TPC-C Benchmark is a post from: Database Geek Blog</p>
<p>Running on an IBM System p 570 with two dual-core 4.7 GHz POWER6 processors, Oracle Database 10g Release 2 achieved 404,462.54 tpmC (transactions per minute) with a price-performance ratio of $3.50/tpmC &#8212; a record achievement in 4-core performance. </p>
<p>&#8220;This TPC-C benchmark result, as well as those from the recent two-tier SAP SD Benchmarks, reinforces Oracle Database 10g&#8217;s performance and scalability&#8230; <a href="http://database-geek.com/2007/08/13/oracle-breaks-records-with-new-tpc-c-benchmark/" class="read_more">Read the rest!</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://database-geek.com/2007/08/13/oracle-breaks-records-with-new-tpc-c-benchmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Oracle Cost Based Optimizer: A Webinar</title>
		<link>http://database-geek.com/2007/07/27/the-oracle-cost-based-optimizer-a-webinar/</link>
		<comments>http://database-geek.com/2007/07/27/the-oracle-cost-based-optimizer-a-webinar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LewisC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://database-geek.com/2007/07/27/the-oracle-cost-based-optimizer-a-webinar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://database-geek.com/2007/07/27/the-oracle-cost-based-optimizer-a-webinar/">The Oracle Cost Based Optimizer: A Webinar</a> is a post from: <a href="http://database-geek.com">Database Geek Blog</a></p>
<p>The Oracle Cost Based Optimizer: A Webinar is a post from: Database Geek Blog</p>
<p>Earlier today, I attended a webinar by Hotsos.  The webinar, titled Cost Based Optimizer: 1 of 2, was a basic introduction to the Cost Based Optimizer (CBO) in Oracle and the 10053 trace file.  The CBO optimizes SQL queries and that optimization can be seen in a 10053 trace.  It was not, what I would call, an advanced webinar but was&#8230; <a href="http://database-geek.com/2007/07/27/the-oracle-cost-based-optimizer-a-webinar/" class="read_more">Read the rest!</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://database-geek.com/2007/07/27/the-oracle-cost-based-optimizer-a-webinar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

